[20:00:08] <dilfridge> !proj council
[20:00:08] <willikins> (council@gentoo.org) dilfridge, gyakovlev, mattst88, slyfox, ulm, whissi, williamh
[20:00:11] <dilfridge> meeting time!
[20:00:32] <dilfridge> 1) roll call, who's here?!
[20:00:36] -*- mattst88 here
[20:00:37] -*- slyfox here
[20:00:40] -*- dilfridge here
[20:00:43] -*- Whissi here
[20:00:48] -*- WilliamH here
[20:01:14] <Whissi> Oh great... again I failed and added next week to calendar :/
[20:01:49] * dilfridge has changed topic for #gentoo-council to: "210th meeting: 2021-03-14 19:00 UTC | https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20210314T19 | https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council | https://dev.gentoo.org/~dilfridge/decisions.html | agenda https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/ad023090d6a78a3988a143a4cbf604cc"
[20:02:05] <dilfridge> gyakovlev: ulm: ping!
[20:02:10] <dilfridge> lets wait a moment 
[20:05:04] <dilfridge> doesnt look like they'll make it
[20:05:35] <dilfridge> let's continue for now, we have no really big topics anyway
[20:05:45] <dilfridge> 2) GLEP 67 change adding proxy-maintainer distinction to metadata.xml
[20:05:53] <dilfridge> bug 774489
[20:05:54] <willikins> dilfridge: https://bugs.gentoo.org/774489 "GLEP 67: add proxied-maint="" attribute"; Documentation, GLEP Changes; CONF; mgorny:glep
[20:06:03] <dilfridge> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/8193b6f4b236fdc6b94faa3e88697f7d
[20:06:10] <dilfridge> does anyone see need for discussion?
[20:06:22] -*- slyfox does not
[20:06:41] <Whissi> I would like to understand why we would have to alter every metadata.xml.
[20:07:05] <dilfridge> every metadata.xml? for sure not
[20:07:22] <mattst88> Whissi: the commit message explains the rationale
[20:07:37] <dilfridge> Whissi: where do you see that?
[20:07:55] <dilfridge> +If the attribute is not specified, the default value of ``no``
[20:07:55] <dilfridge> +is assumed.
[20:08:02] <Whissi> Mh, forget it. It says "if the attribute is not specified, the default value of no is assumed"
[20:08:57] <WilliamH> A quick question. can we not tell that a maintainer is a proxy maintainer if the email address they give is not @gentoo.org?
[20:09:16] <mattst88> WilliamH: the commit message addresses that explicitly
[20:09:37] <WilliamH> mattst88:  ok one sec.
[20:09:42] <mattst88> in fact, that's kind of exactly the purpose of the proposal.
[20:11:33] <floppym> Also useful to set proxied="proxy" for relationships like me/Arfrever.
[20:11:58] <dilfridge> anything else?
[20:12:42] <dilfridge> ok let's vote on the proposed amendment of GLEP 67
[20:12:50] -*- dilfridge yes
[20:12:54] -*- Whissi yes
[20:12:55] -*- WilliamH yes
[20:12:59] -*- slyfox yes
[20:13:01] -*- mattst88 yes
[20:13:13] <dilfridge> great, that's unanimous with two absentees
[20:13:21] <dilfridge> 3)
[20:13:30] <dilfridge> Further open bugs with council involvement
[20:13:40] <dilfridge> bug 736760
[20:13:41] <willikins> dilfridge: https://bugs.gentoo.org/736760 "Application to Software Freedom Conservancy"; Gentoo Foundation, Proposals; CONF; mgorny:trustees
[20:13:52] <dilfridge> any news / anything to discuss here?
[20:14:07] <mattst88> not that I've heard
[20:14:14] <dilfridge> given the last comment is from december, I doubt
[20:14:27] <dilfridge> bug 729062
[20:14:27] <willikins> dilfridge: https://bugs.gentoo.org/729062 "Services and Software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in the Gentoo namespace"; Gentoo Council, unspecified; IN_P; jstein:council
[20:14:37] <Whissi> :-]
[20:14:49] <dilfridge> yep, that's like my summaries :-]
[20:15:10] <dilfridge> bug 662982
[20:15:11] <willikins> dilfridge: https://bugs.gentoo.org/662982 "[TRACKER] New default locations for the Gentoo repository, distfiles, and binary packages"; Gentoo Linux, Current packages; CONF; zmedico:dev-portage
[20:15:33] <mattst88> can we just drop council@ from 729062 until whatever needs to happens actually happens?
[20:15:57] <mattst88> same with this one^
[20:15:57] <dilfridge> well, it's a monthly reminder for whissi so :D
[20:16:06] <Whissi> sure
[20:16:17] <Whissi> But we have this scheduled for this week :p
[20:16:27] <slyfox> \o/
[20:16:27] <dilfridge> ok then let's keep it for now 
[20:16:55] <dilfridge> but I think we can drop the locations bug, this looks like nothing will ever happen
[20:17:20] <dilfridge> bug 751010
[20:17:20] <willikins> dilfridge: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751010 "Missing log and summaries for 20191110, 20191208, and 20200412 council meetings"; Gentoo Council, unspecified; CONF; ulm:council
[20:17:28] <dilfridge> that's me :/ soon
[20:17:39] <dilfridge> bug 774120
[20:17:40] <willikins> dilfridge: https://bugs.gentoo.org/774120 "Drop copyright headers in profiles/*"; Gentoo Linux, Profiles; CONF; sam:council
[20:18:01] <dilfridge> anyone whats to say anything about this?
[20:18:15] -*- dilfridge thinks we should just keep the headers everywhere
[20:18:21] -*- Whissi agrees
[20:18:26] <mattst88> seemed like it got shot down, and no one really cared
[20:18:46] <mattst88> radhermit just wanted consistency so his tooling wouldn't have to handle a bunch of things it shouldn't have to
[20:18:58] <dilfridge> do you think this needs a vote? that's probably overkill
[20:19:20] <mattst88> I don't. I don't think anyone's really still advocating for removing the copyrights
[20:19:53] <dilfridge> ok I'm gonna leave a comment that without a vote council tends to recommend just keeping the header / putting it in everywhere
[20:19:58] <dilfridge> fine?
[20:20:02] <slyfox> yes
[20:20:05] <mattst88> works for me
[20:20:08] <Whissi> yup
[20:20:21] <dilfridge> that's the last bug
[20:20:23] <dilfridge> now
[20:20:26] <dilfridge> 4) open floor
[20:20:28] <dilfridge> anyone?
[20:22:13] <dilfridge> looks like nothing
[20:22:20] <dilfridge> so we're done really early today
[20:22:22] <dilfridge> (bang)
[20:22:26] <dilfridge> meeting closed