[2022-10-09T20:00:28+0100] <@sam_> ok
[2022-10-09T20:00:30+0100] <@sam_> !proj council
[2022-10-09T20:00:30+0100] <willikins> sam_: (council@gentoo.org) ajak, dilfridge, gyakovlev, mattst88, mgorny, sam, ulm
[2022-10-09T20:00:33+0100] <@sam_> hello!
[2022-10-09T20:00:42+0100] <@sam_> agenda again: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/5ec2211c5777fd63efb224a21e3d1485
[2022-10-09T20:00:46+0100] <@sam_> 1. Roll call
[2022-10-09T20:00:47+0100] • sam_: here
[2022-10-09T20:00:49+0100] • ulm: here
[2022-10-09T20:00:50+0100] • arthurzam: here (as mattst88 proxy)
[2022-10-09T20:00:51+0100] • gyakovlev: here
[2022-10-09T20:00:54+0100] • mgorny: here
[2022-10-09T20:01:05+0100] <@sam_> ajak: dilfridge: 
[2022-10-09T20:01:10+0100] • dilfridge: here
[2022-10-09T20:01:26+0100] • ajak: here
[2022-10-09T20:01:29+0100] <@sam_> yay
[2022-10-09T20:01:35+0100] <@sam_> okay, it's a short one today
[2022-10-09T20:01:39+0100] <@sam_> 2. GLEP 78 update [0]
[2022-10-09T20:01:43+0100] <@sam_> [0] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/fa090f351778f1644964d096c20933dd
[2022-10-09T20:01:48+0100] <@sam_> I'll let mgorny explain as it's his item?
[2022-10-09T20:02:03+0100] <@mgorny> i think the summary says it all
[2022-10-09T20:02:23+0100] <@sam_> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/fa090f351778f1644964d096c20933dd it's pretty straightforward again and there was no objection on ML
[2022-10-09T20:02:37+0100] <@mgorny> it's part of the effort of improving our standards
[2022-10-09T20:02:47+0100] <@sam_> a lot of this work has come out of the media type work and also GLEP 78 making us notice some cracks
[2022-10-09T20:02:57+0100] <@mgorny> less implementation-defined and more straight in the spec
[2022-10-09T20:04:00+0100] <@sam_> ok, if no questions, let's just vote on approval
[2022-10-09T20:04:30+0100] • sam_: yes
[2022-10-09T20:04:37+0100] • ajak: yes
[2022-10-09T20:04:39+0100] • arthurzam: yes
[2022-10-09T20:04:44+0100] • gyakovlev: yes
[2022-10-09T20:04:48+0100] • mgorny: yes
[2022-10-09T20:04:49+0100] • ulm: yes
[2022-10-09T20:04:55+0100] • dilfridge: yes
[2022-10-09T20:04:58+0100] <@sam_> \o/
[2022-10-09T20:05:07+0100] <@sam_> motion passes, 7 yes, 0 no, 0 abstention 
[2022-10-09T20:05:20+0100] <@sam_> 3.  Open bugs with council participation
[2022-10-09T20:05:28+0100] <@sam_> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&email2=council%40gentoo.org&emailassigned_to2=1&emailcc2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&query_format=advanced&list_id=6537751
[2022-10-09T20:05:39+0100] <@sam_> we agreed to drop ourselves from bug 176186 last time, so nothing to do there
[2022-10-09T20:05:40+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/176186 "Gentoo projects file hosting"; Gentoo Infrastructure, Other; IN_P; dsd:infra-bugs
[2022-10-09T20:05:56+0100] <@sam_>  
[2022-10-09T20:05:57+0100] <@sam_> 4. Open floor
[2022-10-09T20:06:28+0100] <@ajak> maybe antarus or robbat2 or mgorny could give a quick update on foundation umbrella situation?
[2022-10-09T20:06:31+0100] <@sam_> Anything? The only thing I'm concerned about at the moment is Clang 16 and I'm writing up a summary of that for the gentoo-dev ML
[2022-10-09T20:06:33+0100] <@sam_> ah yes
[2022-10-09T20:06:57+0100] <@mgorny> i've sent metadata.xml glep updates
[2022-10-09T20:07:25+0100] <@mgorny> i'll probably ask for a vote-on-a-bug in a week or so, i'd like to get them in before requesting media type for metadata.xml
[2022-10-09T20:07:26+0100] <@ajak> i'm not sure this is really something worth handling in the meeting though, if antarus or robin aren't here, they're the authoritites as foundation peoples
[2022-10-09T20:07:35+0100] <@mgorny> as it affects security considerations
[2022-10-09T20:07:47+0100] <@sam_> mgorny: sounds fine
[2022-10-09T20:07:59+0100] <@sam_> ajak: yeah, I think we should just bring it up on -project and/or -nfp
[2022-10-09T20:08:01+0100] <@mgorny> but i'd use a suggestion whether i should bump glep version or not
[2022-10-09T20:08:27+0100] <@sam_> > The major version number should be incremented (and minor reset to zero) whenever the meaning of the GLEP changes. The minor version number should be incremented for changes that do not affect the basic meaning (e.g. clarifications, reference implementation updates). Editorial changes should be merged without increasing the version
[2022-10-09T20:08:30+0100] <@sam_> based on that, I'd say just minor
[2022-10-09T20:09:05+0100] <@ulm> +1
[2022-10-09T20:09:13+0100] <@mgorny> ok
[2022-10-09T20:09:14+0100] • ajak: agree
[2022-10-09T20:09:29+0100] <@sam_> ok
[2022-10-09T20:09:32+0100] <@sam_> anything else?
[2022-10-09T20:11:11+0100] <@sam_> let's call it a day then
[2022-10-09T20:11:13+0100] • sam_: bangs the meeting gavel
[2022-10-09T20:11:15+0100] <@sam_> thanks all
[2022-10-09T20:11:19+0100] <@dilfridge> \o/
[2022-10-09T20:11:24+0100] <+arthurzam> Thank you all
[2022-10-09T20:11:25+0100] <@ajak> thanks :)