2023-03-12 18:59:46	@mgorny	ajak: you're chairing, right?
2023-03-12 18:59:51	@ajak	yes
2023-03-12 19:00:28	@ajak	so... meeting time!
2023-03-12 19:00:42	@ajak	agenda: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/77c9ceb451349093369cc2e973719da2
2023-03-12 19:00:49	@dilfridge	yabba-dabba-dooo
2023-03-12 19:00:59	@sam_	woo
2023-03-12 19:01:14	@ajak	1. Roll call
2023-03-12 19:01:16	 *	ajak here
2023-03-12 19:01:17	 *	mattst88 here
2023-03-12 19:01:18	 *	arthurzam here (as proxy for ulm)
2023-03-12 19:01:25	 *	sam_ here
2023-03-12 19:01:33	 *	mgorny here
2023-03-12 19:01:54	 *	dilfridge here
2023-03-12 19:02:10	@mattst88	gyakovlev is not here (COVID)
2023-03-12 19:02:11	@ajak	gyakovlev: 
2023-03-12 19:02:14	@ajak	oh ok
2023-03-12 19:02:23	@sam_	bless
2023-03-12 19:02:41	@ajak	ok, then: 2. Approve update of GLEP 68 [1,2]
2023-03-12 19:03:20	@ajak	https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/79647fad4c28a2f66489f0d8240b527d
2023-03-12 19:03:50	+arthurzam	I think this is good idea, only need to update pkgcheck to use EAPI=5 instead of EAPI=0 when checking those restricts
2023-03-12 19:03:52	@sam_	did someone verify portage actually checks this
2023-03-12 19:03:58	@sam_	(and pkgcheck, yeah)
2023-03-12 19:04:12	+arthurzam	I added a check for that in last month
2023-03-12 19:05:16	@ajak	that would seem to be the only sticking point, not any dissent on the mailing list
2023-03-12 19:05:37	@sam_	it's fine with me anyway to move forward 
2023-03-12 19:06:17	@ajak	ok, so motion: approve ulm's update to glep 68
2023-03-12 19:06:42	 *	mattst88 yes
2023-03-12 19:06:44	@sam_	(reason being that I feel like I/nobody else would get to it in portage if you're waiting on us, so best to just get on with it, as I suspect it works anyway)
2023-03-12 19:06:45	 *	arthurzam yes
2023-03-12 19:06:45	 *	sam_ yes
2023-03-12 19:06:45	 *	dilfridge yes
2023-03-12 19:06:46	 *	ajak yes
2023-03-12 19:06:59	 *	mgorny yes
2023-03-12 19:07:09	@dilfridge	unanimous
2023-03-12 19:07:10	@ajak	yay, unanimous
2023-03-12 19:07:36	@ajak	moving on: 3. Open bugs with Council participation
2023-03-12 19:07:51	@ajak	bug 883715
2023-03-12 19:08:03	@ajak	probably blocked on mgorny's update to that glep
2023-03-12 19:08:28	@ajak	bug 900857
2023-03-12 19:08:29	willikins	ajak: https://bugs.gentoo.org/900857 "Vote on "glep-0076: Relax name policy to allow pseudonyms""; Gentoo Council, unspecified; IN_P; mgorny:council
2023-03-12 19:08:51	@sam_	yeah please vote on that
2023-03-12 19:09:00	@sam_	not here but go do it when you can, ideally now :p
2023-03-12 19:09:39	+arthurzam	Just noting for logs that ulm has already voted on bug so as proxy I don't need to do anything
2023-03-12 19:09:49	@dilfridge	and we already have a majority there (4 yes)
2023-03-12 19:09:52	@ajak	yes
2023-03-12 19:10:01	@ajak	i added that bug as a dep for the first one
2023-03-12 19:10:20	@ajak	so, that brings us to bug 895728
2023-03-12 19:10:21	willikins	ajak: https://bugs.gentoo.org/895728 "GLEP 1, GLEP 2, GLEP 42: Specify that all dates are in the UTC+00:00 time zone"; Documentation, GLEP Changes; IN_P; ulm:glep
2023-03-12 19:10:50	@ajak	i suppose if there's no dissent, ulm will proceed with it soon, seems reasonable to me
2023-03-12 19:10:54	@ajak	pretty straightforward change
2023-03-12 19:11:03	@dilfridge	it makes sense
2023-03-12 19:11:09	@dilfridge	at least more than UTC+7.5
2023-03-12 19:11:11	@sam_	yeah
2023-03-12 19:11:45	@mattst88	yeah, makes sense
2023-03-12 19:11:49	+arthurzam	Maybe only we need to check if other places are missing this clarification (for future fixes, not current one)
2023-03-12 19:12:07	@ajak	right, we can follow up elsewhere as necessary
2023-03-12 19:13:02	@ajak	ok, moving on
2023-03-12 19:13:09	@ajak	4. Open floor
2023-03-12 19:14:51	@ajak	anything?
2023-03-12 19:15:30	@ajak	ok, guess not :)
2023-03-12 19:15:38	 *	ajak bangs gavel
2023-03-12 19:15:46	@sam_	thank you!
2023-03-12 19:15:48	@ajak	all done! thanks all
2023-03-12 19:15:50	@mgorny	thanks
2023-03-12 19:15:50	+arthurzam	Thank you for chairing
2023-03-12 19:16:02	@dilfridge	thank you!