19:01 <@ajak> !proj council
19:01 <willikins> (council@gentoo.org) ajak, dilfridge, mattst88, mgorny, sam, soap, ulm
19:01 <@ajak> meeting time!
19:01  * soap here
19:01  * mgorny here
19:01 <@ajak> 1. Roll call
19:01  * ajak here
19:02  * ulm here
19:03 <@ulm> we have a quorum
19:04 <@ajak> let's wait to :05 just to see
19:05 <@ajak> well, ok, i suppose we'll proceed
19:05 <@ajak> 2. Status of dissolving the foundation/moving under an umbrella org
19:05 <@ajak> i believe ulm was in the process of sorting out the state of things with the umbrellas?
19:06 <@ulm> first of all, trustees had a meeting last Monday
19:06 <@ulm> log is here: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/sites/projects/foundation.git/plain/2023/20231002.log.txt
19:07 <@ulm> in a nutshell, we first intend to followup with SPI again
19:07 <@ulm> next option after that would be one of the Open Collective umbrellas
19:07 <@ulm> i.e. OCF or OSC
19:08 <@ajak> why do we prefer SPI over the others?
19:08 <@ulm> but we would much prefer a 501(c)(3) umbrella, with OSC is not
19:08 <@ajak> ah
19:09 <@ulm> SPI is also the oldest of them, and they have experience with large distros
19:09 <@ulm> like Debian
19:09 <@ajak> and we need to ping them again after they didn't get
19:09 <@ajak> .. get back to us last time?
19:10 <@ulm> yeah, we'll do that soon
19:10 <@ajak> excellent!
19:11 <@ulm> soap: anything to add from your side?
19:11 <@soap> nope
19:12 <@ajak> ok, moving on then
19:12 <@ajak> 3. Acknowledgement of Code of Conduct changes after Proctors project dissolution [1]
19:13 <@ajak> [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project%3ACouncil%2FCode_of_conduct&type=revision&diff=1262578&oldid=1173471
19:13 <@ulm> this just restored the wording from the time before the proctors
19:14 <@ajak> yes
19:14 <@ajak> so lgtm i guess
19:14 <@ulm> it's only a partial revert, because the original change was conflated with other changes
19:14 <@ulm> like removing the "work in progress" warning
19:14 <@mgorny> should we vote?
19:15 <@ajak> vote on acknowledging the change?
19:15 <@ulm> I'm happy if we have consensus, but a vote won't harm :)
19:16 <@ajak> bit silly imho but: motion: acknowledge ulm's change to the code of conduct in the wake of proctors@ dissolution
19:16  * ajak yes
19:16  * mgorny yes
19:16  * soap yes
19:16  * ulm yes
19:16 <@ajak> unanimous!-ish (4 y, 0 n, 3 absent)
19:17 <@ulm> thanks :)
19:17 <@ajak> 4. Open bugs with Council participation [2]
19:17 <@ajak> [2] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council#Open_bugs_with_Council_participation
19:18 <@ajak> just bug 784713
19:18 <willikins> ajak: https://bugs.gentoo.org/784713 "Remove old distfile mirror layout"; Gentoo Council, unspecified; IN_P; mgorny:council
19:18 <@ulm> no action, it's only open so it's in the log
19:19 <@ulm> i.e. we can close it
19:19 <@mgorny> ack
19:19 <@ajak> i don't see recent infra input on that bug, but it was finished off i think, right?
19:19 <@ulm> infra action was split off to bug 914092
19:19 <willikins> ulm: https://bugs.gentoo.org/914092 "Mirrors: remove old distfile mirror layout"; Gentoo Infrastructure, Other; RESO, FIXE; sam:infra-bugs
19:20 <@ajak> oh i see that now, duh
19:20 <@ajak> ok, excellent
19:20 <@ajak> no other bugs
19:20 <@ajak> 5. Open floor
19:21 <@ajak> anything?
19:23  * ajak bangs gavel
19:23 <@ajak> adjourned, thanks all!